Total Immersion Forums  

Go Back   Total Immersion Forums > Freestyle
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2013
CharlesCouturier CharlesCouturier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,244
CharlesCouturier
Default Trivia Question

I am currently looking at an ITU triathlon event (a race that took place in New Zealand.. I think it's the world championship).

I was looking at the race, with a tempo trainer set to a rate (mode 3, so strokes per minute). I set the rate relatively high.

The goal then was to try to find one single swimmer that would display a rate lower than this 'minimal' rate.

I couldn't find any. All athletes, males and females were at least stroking at this minimal rate or higher.

Trivia Quiz:
What is this minimal rate that everyone (elites) seemed to be stroking at?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2013
rcrawf rcrawf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 50
rcrawf
Default

62 strokes per minute.
__________________
finflappinflounder
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2013
CharlesCouturier CharlesCouturier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,244
CharlesCouturier
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcrawf View Post
62 strokes per minute.
Higher (significantly higher) although again, we're talking elites there...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2013
Grant Grant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sooke, BC. Canada
Posts: 581
Grant
Default

I think in the 80 strokes per minute range.
__________________
May we swim with ease at the speeds we choose.
Grant
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2013
rcrawf rcrawf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 50
rcrawf
Default

Ok, just watched elite women and they were 40+ cycles or 80+ strokes per minute. I know the woman use a quicker stroke but I'm going with Grant, maybe even quicker for the men say 85 spm. that would be .705 on the TT per stroke, I think I'll try this tomorrow for half a lap and hope the shoulders don't blow up. I will stay relaxed!
__________________
finflappinflounder
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2013
CharlesCouturier CharlesCouturier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,244
CharlesCouturier
Default

Yeah, we got two winners.

I had my TT set to 80, and I couldn't identify a single swimmer under this rate... (.75)

For the records, conditions were choppy, pretty much the worst you can get for hitting you hard on speed, we're talking 1 and a half feet propelled by the wind, arrggrrr got to swing. Or else you move backward.

Still, food for thought for anyone wanting to compete at this level :)

I am a bit in shock to tell you the truth, I really thought that the males would stroke at lower rates. This is what I find striking.

Last edited by CharlesCouturier : 02-01-2013 at 01:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2013
andyinnorway andyinnorway is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,680
andyinnorway
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesCouturier View Post
Yeah, we got two winners.

I had my TT set to 80, and I couldn't identify a single swimmer under this rate... (.75)

For the records, conditions were choppy, pretty much the worst you can get for hitting you hard on speed, we're talking 1 and a half feet propelled by the wind, arrggrrr got to swing. Or else you move backward.

Still, food for thought for anyone wanting to compete at this level :)

I am a bit in shock to tell you the truth, I really thought that the males would stroke at lower rates. This is what I find striking.
One of my goals for next month's swim is to do some longer sets at 0.96 and monitor SPL decay. My learning from running and cycling training this year is that if you start with high cadence your body gets used to it very quick.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-01-2013
craig.arnold@gmail.com craig.arnold@gmail.com is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 157
craig.arnold@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesCouturier View Post
Yeah, we got two winners.

I had my TT set to 80, and I couldn't identify a single swimmer under this rate... (.75)

For the records, conditions were choppy, pretty much the worst you can get for hitting you hard on speed, we're talking 1 and a half feet propelled by the wind, arrggrrr got to swing. Or else you move backward.

Still, food for thought for anyone wanting to compete at this level :)

I am a bit in shock to tell you the truth, I really thought that the males would stroke at lower rates. This is what I find striking.
It's certainly interesting. I suspect though that the sample is biased in three respects.

Triathletes v Swimmers. Elite v Normal. Wetsuit v Naked.

I think all push towards higher stroke rates than you might otherwise expect.

Elite triathlon fields are elite athletes. This gives them an extraordinary engine. The same applies to ordinary triathletes too, though obviously to a lesser extent.

In the Olympics last year Alistair Brownlee's run time (29.07) was quicker than Mykola Labovskyy's in the 10,000m final. The Ukrainian finished last in 29:32.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-01-2013
CharlesCouturier CharlesCouturier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,244
CharlesCouturier
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by craig.arnold@gmail.com View Post
It's certainly interesting. I suspect though that the sample is biased in three respects.

Triathletes v Swimmers. Elite v Normal. Wetsuit v Naked.

I think all push towards higher stroke rates than you might otherwise expect.

Elite triathlon fields are elite athletes. This gives them an extraordinary engine. The same applies to ordinary triathletes too, though obviously to a lesser extent.

In the Olympics last year Alistair Brownlee's run time (29.07) was quicker than Mykola Labovskyy's in the 10,000m final. The Ukrainian finished last in 29:32.
I agree to some extent. Racing at .75 isn't for everyone. However, I believe that the 2 main components which explain this fascinating fact are "Elite" (vs enthusiastic agper) and Open water (whether it's in Tri context or not). For example, the Mile race is very popular in several parts of the world. A mile swam in the same choppy conditions could have resulted in the same sort of metrics, regardless of if you're a triathlete and regardless of the wetsuit aspect (at least, it's my opinion fwiw)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-01-2013
CharlesCouturier CharlesCouturier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,244
CharlesCouturier
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andyinnorway View Post
One of my goals for next month's swim is to do some longer sets at 0.96 and monitor SPL decay. My learning from running and cycling training this year is that if you start with high cadence your body gets used to it very quick.
I wish from all my heart that I could agree to this, but unfortunately the ramp test often concludes otherwise. Passed a certain level, it's wrong to believe that stroking fast is something one can take for granted.

I'd propose that:
-Most can stroke between 1.0 and .87
-Only some can stroke between .86 and .76
-Very few can stroke over .75 without being specifically prepared for this
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.