View Single Post
  #6  
Old 07-02-2015
Tom Pamperin Tom Pamperin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 712
Tom Pamperin
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s.sciame View Post
Hi Tom! Those 2.5 miles were in open water? Are you sure that the negative split was a matter of breathing and not better navigation/trajectory? If so, that's great! #3 seems a good compromise between symmetry and getting enough air.
Salvo,

I think the breathing was the major factor--it's a straight line out-and-back course I swim, right near shore, so navigation is simple enough. The #3 pattern does give me a faster tempo, so I suppose that's it, mainly.

Tom
__________________
Tom
www.tompamperin.com
Reply With Quote