 |
 |
Here
are a few notes and observations from a couple
of rookie swim coaches. Although we both have
significant competitive swimming experience, this
was our first year as coaches. We live near Scott
AFB in Illinois, which has fielded a youth swim
team in the local summer league for years. We
both had thought about coaching before, but we
got involved last summer as volunteer coaches
because we heard the Director of the Base Youth
Center was not sure who he was going to get to
coach the team or whether they could even keep
it going.
Our coaching philosophy was similar to that of
what we thought of as enlightened little league
baseball coaches we’d observed. We had a
brief, two-month summer season, Memorial Day to
the last weekend in July, during which we wanted
to stress fun, learning and the chance to race,
and let conditioning happen as a by-product of
the time we spent teaching and practicing good
stroke mechanics. We sold this concept to the
parents and swimmers at pre-season meetings, and
encouraged them to invite their friends to join
us. We continued to accept new swimmers up to
the end of the dual meet schedule, and welcomed
those with no prior experience. We made a commitment
to all of our swimmers that everyone who comes
to practice, and is ready to swim, will swim in
every meet, including League Championships. We
didn’t realize until the day of the big
meet just how unusual that commitment was.
Ours was a typical summer league with short events.
All age groups had one race for each stroke—25’s
for 10 & unders, 50’s for 11-12, and
100’s for 13-18 (except fly which was a
50). There was also a 100 IM for everyone but
the 8 & unders. We had a schedule of 10 dual
meets plus League Championships.
We had a wide range of swimmers, from 6 year olds
who could barely finish a lap (or not
at the start of the season!) to experienced swimmers
who swam year round with their clubs. As with
many summer league teams, our most crowded age
groups were the 9-10 boys and the 11-12 girls,
with far fewer 13 and over swimmers. Coach Matt
is an active U.S. Masters Swimmer, and had been
using Total Immersion methods in his own training
since 2001. He and Coach Michael thought that
this approach was the best method for creating
a skill-focused program. Thus, the early season
focused on explaining the philosophy, and teaching
the drills to the swimmers. Based on tips from
Terry
Laughlin’s and Emmett Hines’ articles
on summer league coaching, we planned to work
on starts and turns early and often. Finally,
we thought flexibility and body awareness was
also a key for the kind of swimming we wanted
to teach. Coach Matt worked with a yoga instructor
from the local YMCA to devise a 10-15 minute yoga/stretching
routine to begin every practice. With this basic
outline in place, we began the season.
The first order of business was to break-out the
team into manageable groups. We decided not to
do this with traditional age group divisions because
we wanted to focus on mastering the skills inherent
in the TI drills. We were also aware of having
only two of us to run practices, and would have
trouble keeping too many different groups focused
on task, and we wanted to avoid running more than
one workout session per evening. We decided on
dividing the team into three groups: the "1"
group including those swimmers who could complete
a lap (25 meters) and that was about it; they
lacked fundamental skills in any and all strokes.
The "3" group included experienced swimmers
with good mastery of 2 or more strokes. The "2"
group contained swimmers best described as capable
of finishing a lap or two of freestyle, but still
needing many stroke refinements and an introduction
to the other strokes. At the first practice, we
asked each swimmer to swim a lap of freestyle,
and if they felt comfortable with any of the other
three strokes, to do a lap of one of those as
well. We found that was enough for us to judge
pretty well their skill levels, and we found that
dividing the team into those groups was a useful
tool that served well for the rest of the season.
We used our yoga-inspired stretching routine at
the start of evening practices. We had two reasons:
first, we thought that improved flexibility and
body awareness was beneficial. Second, since the
water temperature in early season can be quite
cold, we wanted to have a useful activity that
could get them a bit warmed up first. The kids’
enthusiasm for this was perhaps underwhelming,
but we persevered.
In keeping with our Little League coaching style,
our workout routine was much more laid back than
what some of our experienced swimmers had come
to expect. We worked on drill mastery early, particularly
the basic balance drills with the younger, less
experienced swimmers. We worked on starts nearly
every day. Initially we did this because the race
distances were so short. However, we continued
because of two unexpected benefits: it reduced
the fear factor for new swimmers who had not used
starting blocks by making it a routine activity,
and the kids had fun enjoying the chance to dive
and frolic. We worked on turns somewhat less,
and that is an area we plan to address more systematically
in the 2003 season.
When we moved into the meet season (2 weeks after
the first practice!), our focus on skills bore
immediate fruit in longer races. A significant
number of our swimmers were taking the lead or
pulling away from their rivals in the second half
of their races, particularly the older swimmers
racing 100’s. It seems we were enjoying
an unexpected "endurance gain" from
the skill focus. We hadn’t trained enough
to improve anyone’s conditioning, but we
had already reduced energy-waste noticeably.
We also noticed that some of our less experienced
swimmers, who had been working mostly on basic
balance, would look good the first half or so
of their races, but their form would deteriorate
when their heads began to come up for breathing.
This seemed to validate Michael’s approach
of moving through the drills more expeditiously
to reach the point where we could mix drills and
swimming over Matt’s more deliberate approach
of getting the early drills exactly right before
moving on.
Having meets scheduled so soon after our first
practice, felt as if it added some pressure to
rapidly progress through the drills to get a serviceable
stroke, and then return to basics for polishing.
Matt also had a sense that he needed too many
words to express a concept, and got puzzled looks
from the swimmers. We frequently used demonstrations
of the drills, whether TI videos before going
into the water, or the coaches demonstrating the
drills. These methods, particularly the coaches
in the water, seemed to help understanding, although
there still seemed to be a disconnect between
what the kids saw and described, and what they
would actually do. This perhaps indicated that
they would learn better with more doing and less
talking, and perhaps more whole stroke swimming
to practice the skills they’d use in the
race. We plan to adjust in this direction for
the coming season, and also plan to use videotaping
as a teaching tool.
That said, the overall approach to the team generated
far more success, in every way, than we ever anticipated.
During the 2001 summer season, we had fewer than
50 swimmers, lost all of our dual meets, and finished
last at Conference Championships. In 2002, we
started with 50 swimmers, and eventually topped
out with over 70 as more kids wanted to join the
team mid-season. We believe the fun-and-learning
focus in practice had a lot to do with making
the swim team a more popular activity. We had
many novice swimmers who made remarkable progress.
The most memorable was a 9-year old from Group
1, who began the season not able to go more that
10 to 15 yards in any stroke without needing to
grab the poolside. She stuck to it, and by the
end of the season, she finished the 25 fly (!)
twice (!!), without getting DQ’ed!!! We
had a rule at the beginning of the season that
if we win a home meet, the coaches get tossed
into the pool. The kids ended up dampening Michael
and Matt several times, as the team went 4-6 in
dual meets, and finished 5th of 8 teams in the
Conference Championship Meet, with lots of dramatic
improvements in personal records, or simply swimming
races the kids never thought they could do.
We’ve already planned how to make the 2003
season even better. We suffered last year from
having three groups (which was a handy way to
divide the team), but only two coaches. Each group
really did need a different practice, with a different
coach fully focused on their needs. We ameliorated
this somewhat by Michael also running a morning
practice as an alternative; however, this was
only a partial solution. This year we will have
Michael, Matt, and three new coaches. This should
address the issue, even if we have to split the
evening into two different sessions because of
the number of swimmers. Matt will again start
with the 1’s; Michael will handle the 2’s.
One of our new coaches is Julie, who is a YMCA
instructor and interested in the TI method. She
will float between Michael and Matt, and may take
over the 1’s if it appears Matt can do the
most good as the floating stroke/technique coach
and team videotaper.
The other two new coaches, Andy and Josh, are
experienced swimmers and age group coaches in
their 20’s. They will run a more challenging
program for the older, more experienced swimmers.
We think Andy and Josh can increase training and
still use good TI stroke mechanics to take our
advanced swimmers to a new level. Recruiting and
retaining older (13+) swimmers is a challenge
in this league. We were typical in that we had
few. Even though we will remain non-traditional,
we hope we can add a more demanding edge for the
swimmers that desire it, so they feel that they
are part of a program they can take seriously.
For most of our kids, we will remain a fun program
emphasizing improvement without struggle. The
key will remain on drills and good mechanics.
We will use fins as learning tools, rather than
traditional equipment like kickboards or pull
buoys. We will likely revive the tradition of
playing water polo on Fridays during dual meet
season. We will keep our commitment that every
swimmer will swim every meet they wish to attend,
including League Championships. That commitment
is unusual for this League (most teams only send
their top 4 swimmers in each event), but we think
it is a higher value for our program than simply
"winning."
Read
more in Six Quick Tips for Summer-League Swimmers
and Coaches.
Matt Shirley is an active duty Navy
Lieutenant Commander currently stationed at U.S.
Transportation Command. He is a proud graduate
of, and was four year swimmer for, the Fightin’
Foresters of Lake Forest College. (Thank you John
Leonard for everything.) He is an active swimmer
and member of U.S. Masters Swimming, an officer
for St. Louis Area Masters Swimming, and a coach
for the Scott Sharks of Scott AFB. You can send
Coach Matt questions or comments at shirmon1@charter.net
Michael Winton is a
retired Air Force pilot whose spouse is stationed
at Scott AFB, IL. Michael began swimming competitively
at age 10 and swam through high school. He played
water polo in college and was a lifeguard and
Water Safety Instructor. Since retirement he has
coached numerous youth sports programs including
soccer, softball and swimming. You can send Coach
Michael questions or comments at Wintonham3@aol.com
All
materials included in this website are Copyright © 2007 by Total Immersion, Inc. All rights
reserved. No portion of this website may be reproduced
or transmitted in any form without permission
in writing from Total Immersion, Inc. For information,
contact: Total Immersion, Inc., 246 Main Street, Suite 15A, New Paltz, NY 12561 Or e-mail
us.
|
 |